- abstract and TOC present - feels a bit more professional
-
purpose-drive and predictable, with the purpose being having fun -
sound much more balanced then some other approaches, hopefully not "Fair and Balanced"
-
"experience in implementing change in volunteer driven scenarios" -
very precise definition of what we need
-
flashback to last years platform - looks like some progress is done,
but most of it is still relevant
- real-life meetings - Yes!
-
small teams - isn't that just splitting Debian up into small, easier
to manage chunks?
-
more friendly environment - Teletuby alert?! Or should we just
redirect all flamewars to the Sauna Cabal?
- accept more leadership - good
-
more frequent and regular releases - please stop beating that horse.
It is a fossil already. Does it really do as good as a project to have
a release every year? Where is the stability in that?
- care more - we can't care less, can we?
-
more resources - please elaborate, what do you mean by resources here?
Global network of Debian approved anti-flamewar saunas?
-
DPL Team - isn't that just another name for nontransparent cabal
running Debian instead of a single nontransparent individual?
-
set goals within teams to become purpose-driven - sounds good on the
first glance, but would that not lead to segregation of purposes?
-
DPL milestones - timeout callback for a DPL. Might help to have a
reason to report even if nothing is done, just to convey that
information based on set deadlines. On the other hand that is extra
"paper"work
-
"Important and/or controversial decisions are made in discussion with
the whole team." - this seems to lack a critical part: "decisions are
made by the DPL", because falling back to "our team decided" is just a
lack of leadership and promotion of birocratcy and lack of
responsibility.
Five word summary: purpose, RL meetings, team, schedules, resources
It looks very thought out, but is it just me or is it also becoming very
birocratic?
Note: the
promised
interview is coming up tomorrow.